[include_top2.htm]
Google
Web www.barternews.com
July 10, 2007

Written by Bob Meyer, Editor of BarterNews

We Want You To Know...When you sign up to receive the FREE weekly Tuesday Report announcement your e-mail address will never be sold, traded, or given to another party.


Please Note: We receive e-mails from people who have signed up for the Tuesday Report, and then tell us they’re not receiving our weekly announcement. In most cases this is because they’re blocking unwanted e-mails.

To ensure that our weekly Tuesday Report e-mail announcement reaches your mail box, we suggest you add bmeyer@barternews.com to your address book or safe sender list.

If you are a frequent visitor to our site we suggest you hit the “refresh” button from time to time as we add information to our site several times a week.


From the desk of Bob Meyer...07/10/07

Currency Expert Tom Greco Speaks In China

Tom Greco, author of Money: Understanding & Creating Alternatives To Legal Tender, made three presentations in China recently, speaking in Beijing, Hangzhou and Shanghai. The appearances were arranged by Sun Xi of Beijing Barter International. Beijing Barter is a member of IRTA.

Kyle MacDonald Readies For International Barter Tour

The 25-year old Canadian blogger who traded a red paper clip—in a series of 15 trades—for a $50,000 house in Kipling (Sask.) will soon have his book (about his bartering experiences) out, and then will embark on an international promotional tour.

Volcker Worries About Private Debt

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who helped put an end to spiraling U.S. inflation after taking office in 1979, says it’s not government debt that worries him, but the private debt that is being piled on private debt in an increasingly leveraged situation.

New Tycoons Highlighted

Alpha Magazine’s annual ranking of the world’s most highly paid fund managers shows that today’s rich keep getting richer.

The top five moneymakers in the hedge fund industry for 2006 are:

$1.7 billion - James Simons, Renaissance Technologies

$1.4 billion - Kenneth Griffin, Citadel Investment Group

$1.3 billion - Edward Lampert, ESL Investments

$950 million - George Soros, Soros Fund Management

$900 million - Steven Cohen, SAC Capital Advisors

All back issues of "From the Desk...” can be accessed by clicking here.

(Please feel free to forward our newsletter to your friends and colleagues. We have a “box” at the end of the newsletter for your convenience. See you next week. . .)

Artist Co-op & Studio Barters For Nearly Anything

Gallagher Studios and Creative Center, an artist cooperative in Ocean Shores (WA), has local artists pitching in with the day-to-day operation of the gallery in exchange for lower commission rates, greater promotion, and discounted supplies.

Owners Tina and Sam Gallagher say the gallery’s co-op nature will make it easier for artists, photographers and sculptors, to do their own promotion and prepare for shows. Their commission rates will be 20% for volunteers and 30% for people who have no role in the gallery. Most galleries, according to them, charge between 40% and 50%. Tina says she wants to make money off her own paintings and not rob other artists blind with commission fees.

Volunteer artists will also lend a hand during the poetry readings and kid’s classes that are planned as weekly events. The kid’s classes and book readings are Gallagher’s attempt to get children inside a place where they’re surrounded by art, places which aren’t usually known for being kid-friendly.

However, they primarily want other artists to use the galleries as a means of exposure that wouldn’t be available otherwise. They have an open-door policy for artists or anyone with an interest in selling their art.

Tina admits she may have to use a cash register one day. But for now, the Gallaghers are more interested in bartering to complete the gallery. “We are willing to barter for anything right now,” Sam remarked. “This is not a cash-up-front place. If someone comes in and says that they’d like a particular painting for their living room and don’t have much money, but have a really great computer desk...it’ll be sold right then.”

They give credit to their landlord for getting them started by providing carpeting and knocking out a window for more natural light.


What Cost Bottled Water?

In 1976, the average U.S. consumer drank 1.6 gallons of bottled water. Last year they drank 28.3 gallons. Only carbonated soft drinks are more popular. But at what cost to our environment?

Charles Fishman, an expert on environmentalism, writes that shipping Fiji’s famously sturdy U.S.-made bottles to the distant island to have them filled and shipped back wastes too many resources for near-imperceptible improvements the water represents over clean, free tap water.

San Franciscan’s who drink mineral water bottled from springs might not realize that most of their tap water comes directly from Yosemite National Park, unfiltered. Bottled water “is often simply an indulgence, and it’s not a benign indulgence,” noted Fishman.

With one billion bottles of water consumed in the U.S. weekly, and 38 billion bottles estimatedly thrown into landfills annually, “the conspicuous consumption of bottled water—that we don’t need—seems wasteful, and perhaps cavalier.”


ANNOUNCEMENT !

Check out the BarterNews daily blog at www.barternewsblog.com for new contacts, strategies and techniques.


"Trade is nothing but the release of what one has in abundance to obtain some other thing one wants."

By Frank Chodorov (1887–1966)

[This article is excerpted from chapter 6 of The Rise and Fall of Society.]

Part II

The point is emphasized by the strategy of war. The objective of a general staff is to destroy the marketplace mechanisms of the enemy; the destruction of his army is only incidental to that purpose. The army could well enough be left intact if his internal means of communication were destroyed, his ports of entry immobilized, so that specialized production, which depends on trade, could no longer be carried on; the people, reduced to primitive existence, thus lose the will to war and sue for peace.

That is the general pattern of all wars. The more highly integrated the economy the stronger will be the nation in war, simply because of its ability to produce an abundance of both military implements and economic goods.

On the other hand, if its ability to produce is destroyed, if the flow of goods is interrupted, the more susceptible to defeat it is, because its people, unaccustomed as they are to primitive conditions, are the more easily discouraged. There is no point to the argument as to whether “guns” or “butter” is more important in the prosecution of war.

It follows that any interference with the operation of the marketplace, however done, is analogous to an act of war. A tariff is such an act. When we are “protected” against Argentine beef, the effect (as intended) is to make beef harder to get, and that is exactly what an invading army would do.

Since the duty does not diminish our desire for beef, we are compelled by the diminished supply to put out more labor to satisfy that desire; our range of possibilities is foreshortened, for we are faced with the choice of getting along with less beef or abstaining from the enjoyment of some other “good.” The absence of a plenitude of meat from the marketplace lowers the purchasing power of our labor. We are poorer, even as is a nation whose ports have been blockaded.

Moreover, since every buyer is a seller, and vice versa, the prohibition against their beef makes it difficult for Argentineans to buy our automobiles, and this expression of our skills is constricted. The effect of a tariff is to drive a potential buyer out of the marketplace. The argument that “protection” provides jobs is patently fallacious. It is the consumer who gives the worker a job, and the consumer who is prevented from consuming might as well be dead, as far as providing productive employment is concerned.

"Any interference with the operation of the marketplace, however done, is analogous to an act of war."

Incidentally, is it jobs we want, or is it beef? Our instinct is to get the most out of life with the least expenditure of labor. We labor only because we want...the opportunity to produce is not a boon, it is a necessity. Neither the domestic nor the foreign producer “dumps” anything into our laps. There is a price on everything we want and the price is always the weariness of toil.

Whatever causes us to put out more toil to acquire a given amount or kind of satisfactions is undesirable, for it conflicts with our natural urge for a more abundant life. Such is a tariff, an embargo, an import quota or the modern device of raising the price of foreign goods by arbitrarily lowering the value of our money. Any restriction of trade, internal or external, does violence to a man's primordial drive to improve his circumstances.

Just as trade brings people together, tending to minimize cultural differences, and makes for mutual understanding, so do impediments to trade have the opposite effect. If the customer is always “right,” it is easy to assume that there is something wrong with the nonbuyer. The faults of those who refuse to do business with us are accentuated not only by our loss, but also by the sting of personal affront.

Should the boy with the tops refuse to trade with the boy who has marbles, they can no longer play together; and this desocialization can easily stir up an argument over the relative demerits of their dogs or parents.

Just so, for all our protestations of good neighborliness, the Argentinean has his doubts about our intentions when we bolt our commercial doors against him; compelled to look elsewhere for more substantial friendship, he is inclined to think less of our national character and culture.

The byproduct of trade isolationism is the feeling that the “outsider” is a “different kind” of person, and therefore inferior, with whom social contact is at least undesirable if not dangerous. To what extent this segregation of people by trade restrictions is the cause of war is a moot question, but there can be no doubt that such restrictions are irritants that can give other causes for war more plausibility; it makes no sense to attack a good customer, one who buys as much of our products as he can use and pays his bills regularly.

Perhaps the removal of trade restrictions throughout the world would do more for the cause of universal peace than can any political union of peoples separated by trade barriers. Indeed, can there be a viable political union while these barriers exist? And, if freedom of trade were the universal practice, would a political union be necessary?

Let us test the claims of “protectionists” with an experiment in logic. If a people prosper by the amount of foreign goods they are not permitted to have, then a complete embargo, rather than a restriction, would do them the most good. Continuing that line of reasoning, would it not be better all around if each community were hermetically sealed off from its neighbor, like Philadelphia from New York?

Better still, would not every household have more on its table if it were compelled to live on its own production? Silly as this reductio ad absurdum is, it is no sillier than the “protectionist” argument that a nation is enriched by the amount of foreign goods it keeps out of its market, or the “balance of trade” argument that a nation prospers by the excess of its exports over imports.

Yet, if we detach ourselves mentally from entrenched myths, we see that acts of internal isolationism such as described in our syllogism are not infrequent. A notorious instance of this is the French octroi, a tax levied on products entering one district from another.

Under cover of “quarantine” regulations, Florida and California have mutually excluded citrus fruits grown in the other state. Labor unions are violent advocates of opulence-through-scarcity, as when they restrict, by direct violence or by laws they have had enacted, the importation of materials made outside their jurisdiction. A tax on trucks entering one state from another is of a piece with this line of reasoning.

Thus, the “protectionist” theory of fence building is internalized, and in the light of these facts our reductio ad absurdum is not so farfetched. The marketplace, of course, scoffs at such scarcity-making measures, for it yields no more than it receives; if its offerings are made scarce by trade restrictions, that which remains becomes harder to get, calls for an expenditure of more labor to acquire. The wage level of Society is lowered.

"Perhaps the removal of trade restrictions throughout the world would do more for the cause of universal peace than can any political union…"

The myth of “protectionism” rests on the notion that the be-all and end-all of human life is laboring, not consumption — and certainly not leisure. If that were so, then the slaves who built pyramids were most ideally situated; they worked much and received little. Likewise, the Russians chained to “five-year plans” have achieved heaven on earth, and so did the workers who, during the Depression, were put to moving dirt from one side of the road to the other.

Extending this notion that exertion for the sake of exertion is the way to prosperity, then a people would be most prosperous if they all labored on projects with no reference to their individual sense of value. What is euphemistically called “war production” is a case in point. But there is in fact no such thing, since the purpose of production is consumption; and it is not on record that any worker built a battleship because he wanted it and proved his craving by willingly giving up anything in exchange for it.

Keeping in mind the exaltation of laboring, would not a people be most uplifted if they all were set to building battleships, nothing else, in return for the necessaries that would enable them to keep on building battleships? They certainly would not be unemployed.

Yet, if we base our thinking on the natural urge of the individual to better his circumstances and widen his horizon, operating always under the natural law of parsimony (the most gain for the least effort), we are compelled to the conclusion that effort which does not add to the abundance of the marketplace is useless effort.

Society thrives on trade simply because trade makes specialization possible, specialization increases output, and increased output reduces the cost in toil for the satisfactions men live by. That being so, the marketplace is a most humane institution.

Universal Law-Of-Reciprocity Key To Trade Exchange Success

Every trade exchange owner in the world should not only be aware of the law-of-reciprocity, but using it, in the operation of their business.

Trade exchange owners are invited to e-mail bmeyer@barternews.com for more information on how you can become “the exchange of choice” in your area. When e-mailing Bob Meyer, put “Law of Reciprocity” in the subject line.


Hotel General Managers

Here’s The Easiest $100,000 You’ll Ever
Bring To The Bottomline!

Collect cash, as usual, from the guest accounts staying at your facility that require the use of professional AV services. And rather than shouldering your ongoing employee costs, or your current vendor’s cash agreement for AV services, here’s a much better alternative:

Work with a proven national vendor (a sterling 25-year track record) who will provide all of the AV services for your hotel on a 100% TRADE BASIS! (Payment to be in the form of hotel rooms and/or trade dollars.)

Your hotel’s annual AV billings must be a minimum of $200,000, and this offer is available only in the continental United States.

For a confidential introduction contact Bob Meyer via e-mail: bmeyer@barternews.com. (Please type in AV Services On Trade in the subject line of your e-mail.)

Attention Trade Exchange Owners:

If your member hotel(s) have a minimum of 10,000 sq. feet of meeting space and annual billings of at least $200,000 for AV services this is a great opportunity to earn substantial cash service fees on the hundreds of thousands of trade dollars your hotel member will be paying the vendor. Contact Bob Meyer at the above e-mail.

(Advertisement)

How To Get More Sales In Hyper-Competitive
Restaurant Industry

Our street-smart restaurant marketing report shows proven ways to rapidly boost your restaurant’s sales & profits. More-->

 


Our Web Site Has A Search Tool For You

Ever wondered if a certain topic, person, or organization has been written about on the Barternews.com web site? Now you can easily find out, as we’ve added a search tool. It will quickly give you the answer to your questions, in 3 easy steps that take about 12 seconds!

At the top right of the page, just under where you sign up for the Tuesday Report you will see a little Google box. It is where you can (1) type in the name of a subject, company, or person. Then (2) click the button www.barternews.com to search the site, followed by (3) hitting the search button.


The Growth and Use of Secondary Capital (New Money) Creates Unprecedented Wealth In Today’s New Age Of Possibility

There are many forms of secondary capital—which can be defined as any financial instrument that measures and communicates value in a common language. Would you like to see and learn more about the many forms of secondary capital?

 We have 70 free, informative and inspiring, articles for you in our “Secondary Capital Section.” Check it out... www.barternews.com/secondary_capital.htm.

Get New Money-Making Ideas And Valuable Contacts!

You can obtain useful, informative ideas and contacts in every available back-issue of BarterNews.


Every barter company in the world is listed on our web site, click through to our Global List of Barter Companies.


Give A Gift To A Friend Or Associate. If you know someone who might benefit from this newsletter, feel free to forward it to them! (See the “box” at the end of the newsletter for the forwarding service.)



We welcome your comments, questions, and observations.
© Copyright BarterNews 2007. Redistribution of BarterNews content expressly prohibited without the prior written permission of BarterNews.
 

about us | about b meyer | from the desk of  | contact us | issues | back issues | consulting services | entrepreneurs package FastStart | order | banner ads | first time visitors | travel section | media section | trade exchange section | corporate barter section | countertrade section | secondary capital sectionreal estate section | trade exchange news 2006 | trade exchange news 2005 | community barter section | restaurant & entertainment section | USA barter companies | global barter companies | sponsors | tuesday report | 2011 Tuesday Reports | 2010 Tuesday Reports | 2009 Tuesday Reports | 2008 Tuesday Reports | 2007 Tuesday Reports | 2006 Tuesday Reports | 2005 Tuesday Reports | 2004 Tuesday Reports | 2003 Tuesday Reports | 2002 Tuesday Reports | 2001 Tuesday Reports | 2000 Tuesday Reports | 1999 Tuesday Reports
Site Architecture & Hosting by XENET